当前位置: 首页 > news >正文

珠海网站建设小小网络wordpress 导入 微信

珠海网站建设小小网络,wordpress 导入 微信,wordpress的多说美化,wordpress文字Android system实战 — 第三方apk权限问题0. 前言1. 源码实现1.1 主要函数1.2 修改思路和实现1.2.1 修改思路1.2.2 方案一1.2.3 方案二0. 前言 最近在调试时遇到了第三方apk申请运行时权限#xff0c;以及signature级别 install 权限不允许赋予给第三方apk#xff0c;虽然这是… Android system实战 — 第三方apk权限问题0. 前言1. 源码实现1.1 主要函数1.2 修改思路和实现1.2.1 修改思路1.2.2 方案一1.2.3 方案二0. 前言 最近在调试时遇到了第三方apk申请运行时权限以及signature级别 install 权限不允许赋予给第三方apk虽然这是Android系统安全性的一种体现但在某些情况下确实是有需求去放开权限使app能使用更方便毕竟让用户允许权限在一定程度上来说并不是一件容易的事情。 1. 源码实现 涉及路径在Android R上权限赋予主要由frameworks\base\services\core\java\com\android\server\pm\permission\PermissionManagerService.java管理 1.1 主要函数 PermissionManagerService中主要负责检查权限及赋予权限的函数为restorePermissionState /*** Restore the permission state for a package.** ul* liDuring boot the state gets restored from the disk/li* liDuring app update the state gets restored from the last version of the app/li* /ul** pThis restores the permission state for all users.** param pkg the package the permissions belong to* param replace if the package is getting replaced (this might change the requested* permissions of this package)* param packageOfInterest If this is the name of {code pkg} add extra logging* param callback Result call back*/private void restorePermissionState(NonNull AndroidPackage pkg, boolean replace,Nullable String packageOfInterest, Nullable PermissionCallback callback) {// IMPORTANT: There are two types of permissions: install and runtime.// Install time permissions are granted when the app is installed to// all device users and users added in the future. Runtime permissions// are granted at runtime explicitly to specific users. Normal and signature// protected permissions are install time permissions. Dangerous permissions// are install permissions if the apps target SDK is Lollipop MR1 or older,// otherwise they are runtime permissions. This function does not manage// runtime permissions except for the case an app targeting Lollipop MR1// being upgraded to target a newer SDK, in which case dangerous permissions// are transformed from install time to runtime ones.final PackageSetting ps (PackageSetting) mPackageManagerInt.getPackageSetting(pkg.getPackageName());if (ps null) {return;}final PermissionsState permissionsState ps.getPermissionsState();final int[] userIds getAllUserIds();boolean runtimePermissionsRevoked false;int[] updatedUserIds EMPTY_INT_ARRAY;for (int userId : userIds) {if (permissionsState.isMissing(userId)) {CollectionString requestedPermissions;int targetSdkVersion;if (!ps.isSharedUser()) {requestedPermissions pkg.getRequestedPermissions();targetSdkVersion pkg.getTargetSdkVersion();} else {requestedPermissions new ArraySet();targetSdkVersion Build.VERSION_CODES.CUR_DEVELOPMENT;ListAndroidPackage packages ps.getSharedUser().getPackages();int packagesSize packages.size();for (int i 0; i packagesSize; i) {AndroidPackage sharedUserPackage packages.get(i);requestedPermissions.addAll(sharedUserPackage.getRequestedPermissions());targetSdkVersion Math.min(targetSdkVersion,sharedUserPackage.getTargetSdkVersion());}}for (String permissionName : requestedPermissions) {BasePermission permission mSettings.getPermission(permissionName);if (permission null) {continue;}if (Objects.equals(permission.getSourcePackageName(), PLATFORM_PACKAGE_NAME) permission.isRuntime() !permission.isRemoved()) {if (permission.isHardOrSoftRestricted()|| permission.isImmutablyRestricted()) {permissionsState.updatePermissionFlags(permission, userId,FLAG_PERMISSION_RESTRICTION_UPGRADE_EXEMPT,FLAG_PERMISSION_RESTRICTION_UPGRADE_EXEMPT);}if (targetSdkVersion Build.VERSION_CODES.M) {permissionsState.updatePermissionFlags(permission, userId,PackageManager.FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED| PackageManager.FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT,PackageManager.FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED| PackageManager.FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT);permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(permission, userId);}}}permissionsState.setMissing(false, userId);updatedUserIds ArrayUtils.appendInt(updatedUserIds, userId);}}PermissionsState origPermissions permissionsState;boolean changedInstallPermission false;if (replace) {ps.setInstallPermissionsFixed(false);if (!ps.isSharedUser()) {origPermissions new PermissionsState(permissionsState);permissionsState.reset();} else {// We need to know only about runtime permission changes since the// calling code always writes the install permissions state but// the runtime ones are written only if changed. The only cases of// changed runtime permissions here are promotion of an install to// runtime and revocation of a runtime from a shared user.synchronized (mLock) {updatedUserIds revokeUnusedSharedUserPermissionsLocked(ps.getSharedUser(), userIds);if (!ArrayUtils.isEmpty(updatedUserIds)) {runtimePermissionsRevoked true;}}}}permissionsState.setGlobalGids(mGlobalGids);synchronized (mLock) {ArraySetString newImplicitPermissions new ArraySet();final int N pkg.getRequestedPermissions().size();for (int i 0; i N; i) {final String permName pkg.getRequestedPermissions().get(i);final String friendlyName pkg.getPackageName() ( pkg.getUid() );final BasePermission bp mSettings.getPermissionLocked(permName);final boolean appSupportsRuntimePermissions pkg.getTargetSdkVersion() Build.VERSION_CODES.M;String upgradedActivityRecognitionPermission null;if (DEBUG_INSTALL bp ! null) {Log.i(TAG, Package friendlyName checking permName : bp);}if (bp null || getSourcePackageSetting(bp) null) {if (packageOfInterest null || packageOfInterest.equals(pkg.getPackageName())) {if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, Unknown permission permName in package friendlyName);}}continue;}// Cache newImplicitPermissions before modifing permissionsState as for the shared// uids the original and new state are the same objectif (!origPermissions.hasRequestedPermission(permName) (pkg.getImplicitPermissions().contains(permName)|| (permName.equals(Manifest.permission.ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION)))) {if (pkg.getImplicitPermissions().contains(permName)) {// If permName is an implicit permission, try to auto-grantnewImplicitPermissions.add(permName);if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, permName is newly added for friendlyName);}} else {// Special case for Activity Recognition permission. Even if AR permission// is not an implicit permission we want to add it to the list (try to// auto-grant it) if the app was installed on a device before AR permission// was split, regardless of if the app now requests the new AR permission// or has updated its target SDK and AR is no longer implicit to it.// This is a compatibility workaround for apps when AR permission was// split in Q.final ListSplitPermissionInfoParcelable permissionList getSplitPermissions();int numSplitPerms permissionList.size();for (int splitPermNum 0; splitPermNum numSplitPerms; splitPermNum) {SplitPermissionInfoParcelable sp permissionList.get(splitPermNum);String splitPermName sp.getSplitPermission();if (sp.getNewPermissions().contains(permName) origPermissions.hasInstallPermission(splitPermName)) {upgradedActivityRecognitionPermission splitPermName;newImplicitPermissions.add(permName);if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, permName is newly added for friendlyName);}break;}}}}// TODO(b/140256621): The package instant app method has been removed// as part of work in b/135203078, so this has been commented out in the meantime// Limit ephemeral apps to ephemeral allowed permissions. // if (/*pkg.isInstantApp()*/ false !bp.isInstant()) { // if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) { // Log.i(TAG, Denying non-ephemeral permission bp.getName() // for package friendlyName); // } // continue; // }if (bp.isRuntimeOnly() !appSupportsRuntimePermissions) {if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Log.i(TAG, Denying runtime-only permission bp.getName() for package friendlyName);}continue;}final String perm bp.getName();boolean allowedSig false;int grant GRANT_DENIED;// 检查permission是否特殊针对不同级别permission赋予不同的grant// Keep track of app op permissions.if (bp.isAppOp()) {mSettings.addAppOpPackage(perm, pkg.getPackageName());}if (bp.isNormal()) {// For all apps normal permissions are install time ones.grant GRANT_INSTALL;} else if (bp.isRuntime()) {if (origPermissions.hasInstallPermission(bp.getName())|| upgradedActivityRecognitionPermission ! null) {// Before Q we represented some runtime permissions as install permissions,// in Q we cannot do this anymore. Hence upgrade them all.grant GRANT_UPGRADE;} else {// For modern apps keep runtime permissions unchanged.grant GRANT_RUNTIME;}} else if (bp.isSignature()) {// For all apps signature permissions are install time ones.allowedSig grantSignaturePermission(perm, pkg, ps, bp, origPermissions);if (allowedSig) {grant GRANT_INSTALL;}}if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, Considering granting permission perm to package friendlyName grant grant);}if (grant ! GRANT_DENIED) {if (!ps.isSystem() ps.areInstallPermissionsFixed() !bp.isRuntime()) {// If this is an existing, non-system package, then// we cant add any new permissions to it. Runtime// permissions can be added any time - they ad dynamic.if (!allowedSig !origPermissions.hasInstallPermission(perm)) {// Except... if this is a permission that was added// to the platform (note: need to only do this when// updating the platform).if (!isNewPlatformPermissionForPackage(perm, pkg)) {grant GRANT_DENIED;}}}switch (grant) {case GRANT_INSTALL: {// Revoke this as runtime permission to handle the case of// a runtime permission being downgraded to an install one.// Also in permission review mode we keep dangerous permissions// for legacy appsfor (int userId : userIds) {if (origPermissions.getRuntimePermissionState(perm, userId) ! null) {// Revoke the runtime permission and clear the flags.origPermissions.revokeRuntimePermission(bp, userId);origPermissions.updatePermissionFlags(bp, userId,PackageManager.MASK_PERMISSION_FLAGS_ALL, 0);// If we revoked a permission permission, we have to write.updatedUserIds ArrayUtils.appendInt(updatedUserIds, userId);}}// Grant an install permission.if (permissionsState.grantInstallPermission(bp) !PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {changedInstallPermission true;}} break;case GRANT_RUNTIME: {boolean hardRestricted bp.isHardRestricted();boolean softRestricted bp.isSoftRestricted();for (int userId : userIds) {// If permission policy is not ready we dont deal with restricted// permissions as the policy may whitelist some permissions. Once// the policy is initialized we would re-evaluate permissions.final boolean permissionPolicyInitialized mPermissionPolicyInternal ! null mPermissionPolicyInternal.isInitialized(userId);PermissionState permState origPermissions.getRuntimePermissionState(perm, userId);int flags permState ! null ? permState.getFlags() : 0;boolean wasChanged false;boolean restrictionExempt (origPermissions.getPermissionFlags(bp.name, userId) FLAGS_PERMISSION_RESTRICTION_ANY_EXEMPT) ! 0;boolean restrictionApplied (origPermissions.getPermissionFlags(bp.name, userId) FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION) ! 0;if (appSupportsRuntimePermissions) {// If hard restricted we dont allow holding itif (permissionPolicyInitialized hardRestricted) {if (!restrictionExempt) {if (permState ! null permState.isGranted() permissionsState.revokeRuntimePermission(bp, userId) ! PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {wasChanged true;}if (!restrictionApplied) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;wasChanged true;}}// If soft restricted we allow holding in a restricted form} else if (permissionPolicyInitialized softRestricted) {// Regardless if granted set the restriction flag as it// may affect app treatment based on this permission.if (!restrictionExempt !restrictionApplied) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;wasChanged true;}}// Remove review flag as it is not necessary anymoreif ((flags FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED) ! 0) {flags ~FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED;wasChanged true;}if ((flags FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT) ! 0) {flags ~FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT;wasChanged true;// Hard restricted permissions cannot be held.} else if (!permissionPolicyInitialized|| (!hardRestricted || restrictionExempt)) {if (permState ! null permState.isGranted()) {if (permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(bp, userId) PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {wasChanged true;}}}} else {if (permState null) {// New permissionif (PLATFORM_PACKAGE_NAME.equals(bp.getSourcePackageName())) {if (!bp.isRemoved()) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED| FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT;wasChanged true;}}}if (!permissionsState.hasRuntimePermission(bp.name, userId) permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(bp, userId)! PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {wasChanged true;}// If legacy app always grant the permission but if restricted// and not exempt take a note a restriction should be applied.if (permissionPolicyInitialized (hardRestricted || softRestricted) !restrictionExempt !restrictionApplied) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;wasChanged true;}}// If unrestricted or restriction exempt, dont apply restriction.if (permissionPolicyInitialized) {if (!(hardRestricted || softRestricted) || restrictionExempt) {if (restrictionApplied) {flags ~FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;// Dropping restriction on a legacy app implies a reviewif (!appSupportsRuntimePermissions) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED;}wasChanged true;}}}if (wasChanged) {updatedUserIds ArrayUtils.appendInt(updatedUserIds, userId);}permissionsState.updatePermissionFlags(bp, userId,MASK_PERMISSION_FLAGS_ALL, flags);}} break;case GRANT_UPGRADE: {// Upgrade from Pre-Q to Q permission model. Make all permissions// runtimePermissionState permState origPermissions.getInstallPermissionState(perm);int flags (permState ! null) ? permState.getFlags() : 0;BasePermission bpToRevoke upgradedActivityRecognitionPermission null? bp : mSettings.getPermissionLocked(upgradedActivityRecognitionPermission);// Remove install permissionif (origPermissions.revokeInstallPermission(bpToRevoke)! PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {origPermissions.updatePermissionFlags(bpToRevoke,UserHandle.USER_ALL,(MASK_PERMISSION_FLAGS_ALL ~FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION), 0);changedInstallPermission true;}boolean hardRestricted bp.isHardRestricted();boolean softRestricted bp.isSoftRestricted();for (int userId : userIds) {// If permission policy is not ready we dont deal with restricted// permissions as the policy may whitelist some permissions. Once// the policy is initialized we would re-evaluate permissions.final boolean permissionPolicyInitialized mPermissionPolicyInternal ! null mPermissionPolicyInternal.isInitialized(userId);boolean wasChanged false;boolean restrictionExempt (origPermissions.getPermissionFlags(bp.name, userId) FLAGS_PERMISSION_RESTRICTION_ANY_EXEMPT) ! 0;boolean restrictionApplied (origPermissions.getPermissionFlags(bp.name, userId) FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION) ! 0;if (appSupportsRuntimePermissions) {// If hard restricted we dont allow holding itif (permissionPolicyInitialized hardRestricted) {if (!restrictionExempt) {if (permState ! null permState.isGranted() permissionsState.revokeRuntimePermission(bp, userId) ! PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {wasChanged true;}if (!restrictionApplied) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;wasChanged true;}}// If soft restricted we allow holding in a restricted form} else if (permissionPolicyInitialized softRestricted) {// Regardless if granted set the restriction flag as it// may affect app treatment based on this permission.if (!restrictionExempt !restrictionApplied) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;wasChanged true;}}// Remove review flag as it is not necessary anymoreif ((flags FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED) ! 0) {flags ~FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED;wasChanged true;}if ((flags FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT) ! 0) {flags ~FLAG_PERMISSION_REVOKED_COMPAT;wasChanged true;// Hard restricted permissions cannot be held.} else if (!permissionPolicyInitialized ||(!hardRestricted || restrictionExempt)) {if (permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(bp, userId) !PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {wasChanged true;}}} else {if (!permissionsState.hasRuntimePermission(bp.name, userId) permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(bp,userId) ! PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED;wasChanged true;}// If legacy app always grant the permission but if restricted// and not exempt take a note a restriction should be applied.if (permissionPolicyInitialized (hardRestricted || softRestricted) !restrictionExempt !restrictionApplied) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;wasChanged true;}}// If unrestricted or restriction exempt, dont apply restriction.if (permissionPolicyInitialized) {if (!(hardRestricted || softRestricted) || restrictionExempt) {if (restrictionApplied) {flags ~FLAG_PERMISSION_APPLY_RESTRICTION;// Dropping restriction on a legacy app implies a reviewif (!appSupportsRuntimePermissions) {flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_REVIEW_REQUIRED;}wasChanged true;}}}if (wasChanged) {updatedUserIds ArrayUtils.appendInt(updatedUserIds, userId);}permissionsState.updatePermissionFlags(bp, userId,MASK_PERMISSION_FLAGS_ALL, flags);}} break;default: {if (packageOfInterest null|| packageOfInterest.equals(pkg.getPackageName())) {if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, Not granting permission perm to package friendlyName because it was previously installed without);}}} break;}} else {if (permissionsState.revokeInstallPermission(bp) !PERMISSION_OPERATION_FAILURE) {// Also drop the permission flags.permissionsState.updatePermissionFlags(bp, UserHandle.USER_ALL,MASK_PERMISSION_FLAGS_ALL, 0);changedInstallPermission true;if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, Un-granting permission perm from package friendlyName (protectionLevel bp.getProtectionLevel() flags0x Integer.toHexString(PackageInfoUtils.appInfoFlags(pkg, ps)) ));}} else if (bp.isAppOp()) {// Dont print warning for app op permissions, since it is fine for them// not to be granted, there is a UI for the user to decide.if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS (packageOfInterest null|| packageOfInterest.equals(pkg.getPackageName()))) {Slog.i(TAG, Not granting permission perm to package friendlyName (protectionLevel bp.getProtectionLevel() flags0x Integer.toHexString(PackageInfoUtils.appInfoFlags(pkg, ps)) ));}}}}if ((changedInstallPermission || replace) !ps.areInstallPermissionsFixed() !ps.isSystem() || ps.getPkgState().isUpdatedSystemApp()) {// This is the first that we have heard about this package, so the// permissions we have now selected are fixed until explicitly// changed.ps.setInstallPermissionsFixed(true);}updatedUserIds revokePermissionsNoLongerImplicitLocked(permissionsState, pkg,updatedUserIds);updatedUserIds setInitialGrantForNewImplicitPermissionsLocked(origPermissions,permissionsState, pkg, newImplicitPermissions, updatedUserIds);updatedUserIds checkIfLegacyStorageOpsNeedToBeUpdated(pkg, replace, updatedUserIds);}// Persist the runtime permissions state for users with changes. If permissions// were revoked because no app in the shared user declares them we have to// write synchronously to avoid losing runtime permissions state.if (callback ! null) {callback.onPermissionUpdated(updatedUserIds, runtimePermissionsRevoked);}for (int userId : updatedUserIds) {notifyRuntimePermissionStateChanged(pkg.getPackageName(), userId);}} 1.2 修改思路和实现 1.2.1 修改思路 其实我们阅读一下代码可以理解到Android 会对app申请的权限进行对应分级比如说signature级权限、dangerous权限仅能赋予系统apk等等的特殊处理。基于这个流程我们有两种思路 所有app申请的权限都作为install 权限赋予给app不改变原有流程模拟用户操作或跳过某些判断 下面我们以跳过runtime permission请求和赋予第三方apksignature级权限为例 1.2.2 方案一 这种方法比较简单粗暴但是改变了原有流程目前发现造成某些依赖的so无法找到导致crash的问题目前暂时未查出原因但是大部分情况下应该是可以hold住的 diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java index a0cae5c..c21ce8f 100644 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.javab/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java-121,6 121,7 import android.util.Slog;import android.util.SparseArray;import android.util.SparseBooleanArray; import android.os.SystemProperties;import com.android.internal.annotations.GuardedBy;import com.android.internal.annotations.VisibleForTesting;-2846,7 2847,11 friendlyName grant grant);}- if (grant ! GRANT_DENIED) {String proj_type SystemProperties.get(sys.proj.type, null);if (mobile.equals(proj_type) || telecom.equals(proj_type) || unicom.equals(proj_type)) {grant GRANT_INSTALL;}if (grant ! GRANT_DENIED) {if (!ps.isSystem() ps.areInstallPermissionsFixed() !bp.isRuntime()) {// If this is an existing, non-system package, then// we cant add any new permissions to it. Runtime 1.2.3 方案二 跳过runtime permission 这次的改法就是模拟用户已经允许了runtime permission修改了flags为USER_SET并grant 运行权限 diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java index c21ce8f..c2edbf4 100644 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.javab/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java-2847,10 2847,6 friendlyName grant grant);}- String proj_type SystemProperties.get(sys.proj.type, null); - if (mobile.equals(proj_type) || telecom.equals(proj_type) || unicom.equals(proj_type)) { - grant GRANT_INSTALL; - }if (grant ! GRANT_DENIED) {if (!ps.isSystem() ps.areInstallPermissionsFixed() !bp.isRuntime()) {// If this is an existing, non-system package, then-3001,12 2997,17 }} flags | FLAG_PERMISSION_USER_SET;if (wasChanged) {updatedUserIds ArrayUtils.appendInt(updatedUserIds, userId);}permissionsState.updatePermissionFlags(bp, userId,MASK_PERMISSION_FLAGS_ALL, flags);String proj_type SystemProperties.get(sys.proj.type, null);if (mobile.equals(proj_type) || telecom.equals(proj_type) || unicom.equals(proj_type)) {permissionsState.grantRuntimePermission(bp, userId);} }} break; 赋予第三方apk signature权限 跳过判断是否allowed diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java index 8d2363b..a0cae5c 100644 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.javab/services/core/java/com/android/server/pm/permission/PermissionManagerService.java-103,6 103,7 import android.os.UserManagerInternal;import android.os.storage.StorageManager;import android.os.storage.StorageManagerInternal; import android.os.SystemProperties;import android.permission.IOnPermissionsChangeListener;import android.permission.IPermissionManager;import android.permission.PermissionControllerManager;-2835,14 2836,14 } else if (bp.isSignature()) {// For all apps signature permissions are install time ones.allowedSig grantSignaturePermission(perm, pkg, ps, bp, origPermissions); - if (allowedSig) {if (allowedSig || mobile.equals(SystemProperties.get(sys.proj.type, null))) {grant GRANT_INSTALL;}}if (DEBUG_PERMISSIONS) {Slog.i(TAG, Considering granting permission perm to package - friendlyName);friendlyName grant grant);}if (grant ! GRANT_DENIED) {
http://www.hkea.cn/news/14522839/

相关文章:

  • 找别人做网站的注意事项网络网站开发设计
  • 医疗服务网站素材wordpress当前页面id
  • 中国建设银行个人网站建设网站市场细分
  • layui做网站word调用wordpress
  • 网站建设分工说明怎么做m开头的网站
  • 商务网站要怎么设计交换友情链接是什么意思
  • 网站用什么软件程序做优化网站公司价格是多少钱
  • 玉树电子商务网站建设哪家好网站设计的原则
  • 网站不推广如何排名怎么搭建个人网站电脑做服务器
  • 网站开发需求说明书秒收录关键词代发
  • 建设银行网站邮箱网站流量seo
  • 家具网站素材成都网站建设哪个好
  • 商丘网站建设设计网上开店策划书
  • 温州网站建设方案外包野花社区在线观看高清视频动漫
  • 网站编程培训班健康陕西app管理端
  • 医院网站建设案例开发网站公司交税
  • 在线做行测的网站网站建设与管理案例教程教学大纲
  • 电子商务网站建设及推广怎么在360网站做词条
  • 诸城网站设计网站用哪些系统做的比较好用
  • 不会写代码怎样做网站类似全民互推的推广平台
  • 给 小企业 建设网站wordpress 弹窗浮动层
  • 工业品一站式采购平台wordpress 可视化排版
  • 嘉兴做网站赚钱么大庆加油app老版本
  • 丽水网站seowordpress音乐列表
  • 郑州网站建设那家好网址源码在线查看
  • 免费的网站网站建设的工作视频人的吗
  • 食品网站建设网站每天点击量多少好
  • 无锡网站建设推荐智勇招投标网站开发
  • 郑州企业网站建设公司深圳网站建设方维
  • 深圳专业做网站电话做网站标题代码