烟台放心的一站式网站建设,wap网络,在线电子商务网站开发,wordpress只能进首页前言#xff1a;
signal 是一种通信机制#xff0c;可以跨进程发送#xff0c;可以同进程跨线程发送#xff0c;可以不同进程向指定线程发送。
信号的创建有两套api#xff0c;一个是signal#xff0c;一个是sigaction#xff0c;signal缺陷很多#xff0c;比如没有提…前言
signal 是一种通信机制可以跨进程发送可以同进程跨线程发送可以不同进程向指定线程发送。
信号的创建有两套api一个是signal一个是sigactionsignal缺陷很多比如没有提供触发后自动再次设置处理信号处理策略这会导致连续触发的两个信号一个进入了期待的信号处理流程另外一个则进入了默认的信号处理流程。
信号的递送和接受处理是异步的即信号发送者不会因为信号接收者使用了阻塞信号处理函数而被阻塞住。但是信号的递送可能会出现阻塞这个阻塞发生在信号发送者把信号送入内核的信号队列中(需要从代码层面验证)。 信号处理方式
信号的处理有三种方式默认忽略信号处理函数可以在使用 sigaction 创建信号处理策略时指定。 默认分为如下几种 Term Default action is to terminate the process. Ign Default action is to ignore the signal. Core Default action is to terminate the process and dump core (see core(5)). Stop Default action is to stop the process. Cont Default action is to continue the process if it is currently stopped. 不同信号的默认行为如下 Signal Standard Action Comment ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── SIGABRT P1990 Core Abort signal from abort(3) SIGALRM P1990 Term Timer signal from alarm(2) SIGBUS P2001 Core Bus error (bad memory access) SIGCHLD P1990 Ign Child stopped or terminated SIGCLD - Ign A synonym for SIGCHLD SIGCONT P1990 Cont Continue if stopped SIGEMT - Term Emulator trap SIGFPE P1990 Core Floating-point exception SIGHUP P1990 Term Hangup detected on controlling terminal or death of controlling process SIGILL P1990 Core Illegal Instruction SIGINFO - A synonym for SIGPWR SIGINT P1990 Term Interrupt from keyboard SIGIO - Term I/O now possible (4.2BSD) SIGIOT - Core IOT trap. A synonym for SIGABRT SIGKILL P1990 Term Kill signal SIGLOST - Term File lock lost (unused) SIGPIPE P1990 Term Broken pipe: write to pipe with no readers; see pipe(7) SIGPOLL P2001 Term Pollable event (Sys V). Synonym for SIGIO SIGPROF P2001 Term Profiling timer expired SIGPWR - Term Power failure (System V) SIGQUIT P1990 Core Quit from keyboard SIGSEGV P1990 Core Invalid memory reference SIGSTKFLT - Term Stack fault on coprocessor (unused) SIGSTOP P1990 Stop Stop process SIGTSTP P1990 Stop Stop typed at terminal SIGSYS P2001 Core Bad system call (SVr4); see also seccomp(2) SIGTERM P1990 Term Termination signal SIGTRAP P2001 Core Trace/breakpoint trap SIGTTIN P1990 Stop Terminal input for background process SIGTTOU P1990 Stop Terminal output for background process SIGUNUSED - Core Synonymous with SIGSYS SIGURG P2001 Ign Urgent condition on socket (4.2BSD) SIGUSR1 P1990 Term User-defined signal 1 SIGUSR2 P1990 Term User-defined signal 2 SIGVTALRM P2001 Term Virtual alarm clock (4.2BSD) SIGXCPU P2001 Core CPU time limit exceeded (4.2BSD); see setrlimit(2) SIGXFSZ P2001 Core File size limit exceeded (4.2BSD); see setrlimit(2) SIGWINCH - Ign Window resize signal (4.3BSD, Sun) 通过pthread_kill进行线程间信号传递
信号可以时线程级别的可以通过 pthread_kill 给同进程的其他线程发信号可以通过 tgkill 给其他进程的指定线程发信号通过 raise 可以给当前线程发信号。
Demo:
#include signal.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
#include pthread.h
#include sys/types.hpthread_t newtid;void usrHandler(int signum,siginfo_t *info,void *ucontext)
{printf([SIGUSR1 handler thread] tid - %d , ready to send SIGUSR2 to child thread \n,gettid());pthread_kill(newtid,SIGUSR2);printf([SIGUSR1 handler thread] tid - %d , SIGUSR2 sent out \n,gettid());
}void usrHandler2(int signum,siginfo_t *info,void *ucontext)
{printf([SIGUSR2 handler thread] tid - %d , %d , SIGUSR2 received \n,gettid(),signum);
}void* threadRoutine(void* arg)
{pthread_t tid *(pthread_t*)arg;printf([new thread] tid - %d , arg - %d \n,gettid(),tid);// set SIGSUR2sigset_t mask2;sigemptyset(mask2);struct sigaction act2;memset(act2,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));struct sigaction oldact2;memset(oldact2,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));act2.sa_sigaction usrHandler2;act2.sa_mask mask2;act2.sa_flags 0; //no flag is setsigaction(SIGUSR2, act2, oldact2);while(1) {;}
}int main(int argc,char** argv)
{printf([main thread] tid - %d \n,gettid());
// set SIGUSR1sigset_t mask;sigemptyset(mask);struct sigaction act;memset(act,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));struct sigaction oldact;memset(oldact,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));act.sa_sigaction usrHandler;act.sa_mask mask;act.sa_flags 0; //no flag is setsigaction(SIGUSR1, act, oldact);pthread_t maintid gettid();pthread_create(newtid,NULL,threadRoutine,(void*)maintid);sleep(2);while(1) {raise(SIGUSR1);sleep(2);}
}上面的例子中主线程会循环给自己发信号 SIGUSR1 在信号处理函数中会给子线程发送 SIGUSR2。
当子线程通过pthread_kill给主线程发送信号时会产生 SIGSEGV 具体原因不明如果有类似情况可以参考如下
pthread_kill引发的争论 - 简书最近提测的一段代码中有一个遇到一个诡异的bug总是崩溃在pthread_kill这个函数上并且不是每次比现。调用逻辑大致如下利用pthread_kill判断一个线程是...https://www.jianshu.com/p/756240e837dd ps可以通过 pause 挂起当前线程直到等到一个信号为止可以通过 sigsuspend 挂起当前线程直到等到某些信号为止。 管理mask
每个线程都有自己的mask可以通过pthread_sigmask来管理。 通过mask进行信号block
使用sigaction创建信号处理策略时指定mask。被列入mask集合中的signal会被阻塞直到阻塞信号的动作结束这些信号会被继续投递到信号处理逻辑中。
比如通过sigaction 指定 “当发生SIGUSR1的时候阻塞所有SIGUSR2”那么如果 SIGUSR1 的信号处理函数耗时较长那么 SIGUSR2 会一直等到 SIGUSR1 的处理函数走完才会被递送给相应的进程/线程 以触发 默认动作/忽略动作/信号处理函数。
Demo
#include signal.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h#define USRSIG SIGUSR1
#define RTSIG SIGRTMIN8void usrHandler(int signum,siginfo_t *info,void *ucontext)
{printf(%d , SIGUSR1 reveived \n,signum);printf(Sender pid[%d] , User cost time [%ld] , System cost time [%ld] , si_code [%d] \n ,info-si_pid,info-si_utime,info-si_stime,info-si_code);sleep(15);printf(exit usrHandler\n);
}void usrHandler2(int signum,siginfo_t *info,void *ucontext)
{printf(%d , SIGUSR2 received \n,signum);
}int main(int argc,char** argv)
{
// set SIGUSR1sigset_t mask;sigemptyset(mask);sigaddset(mask,SIGUSR2); // SIGUSR2 will be blocked when usrHandler is executing. After return from usrHandler, SIGUSR2 will// be received adn surHandler2 will be executed.struct sigaction act;memset(act,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));struct sigaction oldact;memset(oldact,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));act.sa_sigaction usrHandler;act.sa_mask mask;act.sa_flags 0; //no flag is setsigaction(SIGUSR1, act, oldact);// set SIGSUR2sigset_t mask2;sigemptyset(mask2);struct sigaction act2;memset(act2,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));struct sigaction oldact2;memset(oldact2,0x0,sizeof(struct sigaction));act2.sa_sigaction usrHandler2;act2.sa_mask mask2;act2.sa_flags 0; //no flag is setsigaction(SIGUSR2, act2, oldact2);while(1) {;}
}当通过 kill 连续发送 SIGUSR1 和 SIGUSR2 给上面的例子时会发现执行流程会卡在 SIGUSR1 处理函数的 sleep 这是因为针对 SIGUSR1 设置了block SIGUSR2这会导致 SIGUSR2 无法中断 SIGUSR1。
